SIMPLE RHYME

Someone has got me ranting about rhyming couplets – I can’t call them anything but doggerel, and hate them with a passion…and I don’t hate anything or anyone but they are vile. Why do newbie writers fall for them? They’re not even attractive. All that shoving words where they don’t belong, twisting sentences out of all recognition makes me want to heave up into the world like some kind of Heaven-sent quake – even though I don’t believe in Heaven!

I critiqued someone’s poem on an online writing site, and mentioned that she might want to move away from rhyming couplets (for the reasons stated above) towards three and four-line rhyming schemes, if rhyme she must. Another writer made a comment that my criticism was too harsh, and perhaps it was, but the reason for the crit was because I saw something in her; if I hadn’t I would never have stopped to comment much less take the time to fashion a critique. He stated that she had posted the work under Simple Rhyme.

Simple Rhyme! What the hell is that? Yes, you would have to be seeing poetry in a very basic (old fashioned) way to fall into the trap of something so simple and feeble as rhyming couplets…note, I don’t capitalise their first letters – they don’t deserve that kind of attention. I have never been drawn towards that kind of poetry and couldn’t wait to get away from it in childhood – so I don’t have the same romantic image of poetry that a lot of newbie writers have; I don’t want to make copies of that old stuff.

The only old work, using rhyme, that impresses me are some of Larkin’s and especially Dylan Thomas’s Villanelle

Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night:

‘Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rage at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.’

I think I can like any poem that is constructed carefully so that every word is justified and has a real place in the work, not just existing to fill a rhyme. Poets who insist on rhyme are putting the rhyme before the subject matter…and isn’t the subject matter supposed to be the reason the poet writes the poem? Or, the metaphor and imagery; shouldn’t they have room at the top? I think rhyme should be a choice, and a last one at that. The poem, the statement, the emotion underneath needs to arrive first…and the rhyme should sway in the breeze, not batter the reader about the head before they can understand what is being said or portrayed.

Rant over. Maybe I’ll go browse a few poems, look for another fight.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “SIMPLE RHYME

  1. Are couplets that rhyme so much worse
    than other types of pitiful verse
    at least I’m not talking about Nantucket
    and a citizen with an incredibly large bucket
    but seriously though my dear friend
    I am thankful for your wisdom in the end
    and I promise to open my mind
    to verse the do not end in rhyme

  2. Haha DB 🙂

    What makes the 2-line rhyme ‘simple’ is the fact that it is not really considered and they’re often first draft ditties so how can you take them seriously? The shape a poem takes should be worked out after the words or sense are formulated/devised. The difference is TIME.

    🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s